<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASWC town hall draws student input</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whitmanpioneer.com/news/news-feature/2009/10/29/aswc-town-hall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whitmanpioneer.com/news/news-feature/2009/10/29/aswc-town-hall/</link>
	<description>The Pioneer &#124; Whitman news, delivered.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Sommers</title>
		<link>http://whitmanpioneer.com/news/news-feature/2009/10/29/aswc-town-hall/comment-page-1/#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Sommers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitmanpioneer.com/?p=9300#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>This is really well written! Nice job Liz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really well written! Nice job Liz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian Frew</title>
		<link>http://whitmanpioneer.com/news/news-feature/2009/10/29/aswc-town-hall/comment-page-1/#comment-5586</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Frew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitmanpioneer.com/?p=9300#comment-5586</guid>
		<description>Nice article, Liz!  This graph seemed like it needed some more substance: 

&quot;Discussion was mixed on this issue as students raised concerns about a proposed change in the name from “Alternative Voices” to “Critical Perspectives” and why exactly Whitman even has that distribution requirement.&quot;

Who thinks it shouldn&#039;t be a requirement?  Why?

Also, I think a smart way to format this article would be to just split it into the three sub-categories (GoPrint, Alt. Voices, plagiarism) since it does that pretty organically already. 

The last quote was kind of confusing...they&#039;re trying to ideas for things they&#039;ve already done this semester?  If I were you, I&#039;d just cut it after &quot;new problems we can fix.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, Liz!  This graph seemed like it needed some more substance: </p>
<p>&#8220;Discussion was mixed on this issue as students raised concerns about a proposed change in the name from “Alternative Voices” to “Critical Perspectives” and why exactly Whitman even has that distribution requirement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who thinks it shouldn&#8217;t be a requirement?  Why?</p>
<p>Also, I think a smart way to format this article would be to just split it into the three sub-categories (GoPrint, Alt. Voices, plagiarism) since it does that pretty organically already. </p>
<p>The last quote was kind of confusing&#8230;they&#8217;re trying to ideas for things they&#8217;ve already done this semester?  If I were you, I&#8217;d just cut it after &#8220;new problems we can fix.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
